What is Patañjali?
Patañjali is the figure to whom the Yoga Sūtras are attributed. Composed between the 2nd century BCE and the 4th century CE, these 196 aphorisms gave classical Indian yoga its eight-limbed structure and its enduring philosophical framework within the Sāṃkhya§ tradition.
What is known and what isn't
Almost nothing certain is known about Patañjali as a person. The dating of the Yoga Sūtras is contested: scholarly proposals range from the 2nd century BCE to the 4th century CE, with the 2nd–3rd century CE as the current centre of gravity. Whether this Patañjali is the same person as the grammarian Patañjali, author of the Mahābhāṣya (a major commentary on Pāṇini's Sanskrit grammar), remains unsettled. The South Indian tradition treats the two as one figure; philological evidence treats them as separate. What is uncontested is the text. The Yoga Sūtras, 196 short aphorisms arranged in four chapters, gave the Indian discipline of yoga an architecture it would carry for the next two thousand years.
The eight-limbed path
The text's most consequential move is its compression of the practice into eight named limbs (aṣṭāṅga). The first two are ethical: yama, five external restraints beginning with non-harming, and niyama, five internal disciplines beginning with cleanliness and ending with surrender to the absolute. The third is āsana, the steady seat from which the rest of the practice proceeds. The modern Western postural-yoga industry has expanded this single limb into a self-contained discipline. The fourth is prāṇāyāma, the disciplined regulation of the breath and the vital energy§ it carries. The fifth is pratyāhāra, the withdrawal of the senses from their ordinary objects. The final three, dhāraṇā (concentration), dhyāna (meditation), and *samādhi*§ (absorption), Patañjali groups together as saṁyama. He treats them not as three discrete techniques but as a single graded continuum. The text holds that the limbs support each other and the path begins wherever the practitioner can begin.
The philosophical centre
The Yoga Sūtras are dualist where the Vedānta§ commentaries are non-dual. Their metaphysics descends from the Sānkhya school, which separates puruṣa (consciousness) from prakṛti (everything else, including mind). The text's most quoted line is yogaś cittavṛtti-nirodhaḥ: yoga is the cessation of the modifications of mind-stuff. When the activity of citta settles, puruṣa abides in its own nature, undisguised. The four chapters move through kinds of absorption (samādhi), the practice that produces them (sādhana), the powers it unlocks (vibhūti), and liberation (kaivalya). Classical commentary explicitly warns against treating the supernormal capacities of the vibhūti chapter as the goal. The non-dual§ traditions arrive at a similar destination by recognising consciousness as one. The Yoga Sūtras arrive there by separating consciousness from what it is not. In lived practice the difference is smaller than the metaphysical disagreement suggests. Later teachers, including Ramana Maharshi§, treat the two presentations as different doors into the same room.
In the index
Sadhguru's *Inner Engineering: A Yogi's Guide to Joy*↗ is the most direct contemporary entry into the eight-limbed framework a Western reader is likely to encounter. The book treats yama, niyama, and the inner limbs as a single working curriculum, grounded in the Śaiva yogic stream of southern India that runs in parallel to the Sūtra commentary tradition. The Inner Engineering Online course↗ is the practice-side companion. Sadhguru's longer-form lectures↗, including the talk on disability and spiritual practice↗ and the talk on unlocking the mind's full potential↗, make the citta-vṛtti-nirodhaḥ claim accessible without naming it. In each case the operative move is settling mental activity into the steadier ground the Sūtras call yoga. Paramahansa Yogananda's *Autobiography of a Yogi*↗ carries the kriyā lineage, which descends from a different stream: the householder transmission of disciplined inner technique. It treats the Yoga Sūtras' eight-limbed architecture as the operating system on which its more esoteric practices run.
What he isn't
Patañjali is not the founder of yoga. By the time the Yoga Sūtras were composed, the discipline had been developing for several centuries across the Upaniṣadic, Jain, and early Buddhist textual record. The Sūtras are better read as a synthesis of an existing tradition than as its starting point. The text is also not the only canonical source for yoga. The Bhagavad Gītā's account of karma yoga§ and bhakti yoga§, the Haṭha Yoga Pradīpikā on body practices, and the Yoga Vāsiṣṭha on the non-dual§ view each transmit aspects of the Indian yogic tradition that the Sūtras treat briefly or do not name. And Patañjali's eight-limbed path is not the curriculum of modern Western yoga studios. The third limb, āsana, has been extracted, expanded, and made nearly synonymous with yoga in English; the other seven are usually absent. The classical tradition is unambiguous: āsana without the surrounding limbs is a stretching practice. Useful, but partial. To take Patañjali seriously is to read the Sūtras as describing the work of which most contemporary postural yoga is the warm-up.
Last reviewed 2026-05-27
— end of entry —
Working through the vocabulary? Get one entry like this in your inbox each Sunday.

